I’m trying not to take an either/or stance in this response. I think that Andrew Lam is invested in creating East/West balance instead of establishing binaries. I will go on to say that some of his essays left me feeling unfulfilled. Others were thoughtful, engaging and interesting. Since the work wasn't one story then I feel like I'm allowed to like some of it, but not all.
Andrew Lam’s personal essay style utilizes texts—objects, people and food—as tools, portals into memory, transition and meaning. He was skilled in stretching his texts, but some of his concluding positions left me a bit annoyed. Let me be clear—when I picked up the book I assumed it would be critical of the West, and while some of his essays discussed injustice here in the States, the racism and economic turmoil was often positioned as a distant past. Lam seemed invested in optimism, in helping folks (white folks?) grabble with America’s shifting racial landscape—but see there’s yummy multiethnic cuisine now! He claims to be marrying East and West as he writes, but what happens if East and West are still at war? I wanted to gather in Lam’s writing a sense of anger, an urgency to debunk the Model Minority Myth, but I guess that’s not his concern. All good.
It might be Lam’s journalist background, one that prioritizes objectivity that sometimes resulted in a neutral tone of which I didn’t like. I mean, not all writers are going to say something political, but since his book is called East Eats West he’s setting up readers for something. Plus, the cover was misleading. There’s a conflict. East is on top of the West looking ferocious. Superman, I mean the West, flees toward the bottom of the cover. Honestly, I don’t feel that any writer can be objective. Lam writes that he seeks to “reimagine the hemispheres as one,” which makes sense because his own body is a representation of the two hemispheres intertwined, and so I wondered how his writing itself represented a balance between the two.
West writing: the weaving in of research definitely made me think of Western notions of fact checking, of backing up statements with evidence. The essay structure is interested in making an argument and using facts to prove a point. The only problem was that Lam didn’t always have a clear stance. Lam devotes quite a few pages to explaining the socioeconomic advancement of Vietnamese people—what about the Vietnamese immigrants that haven’t attained the American dream? Lam argues that the “concept of filial piety, the idea that the collective assigns and directs the destiny of the individual” has remained a integral part of the Asian immigrant mindset and hasn’t been swayed by Western influence. Yet, he serves as an example of going against his parent’s wishes. What about the other young Asian American writers with potential that never pursued their dreams. I wondered about them…
Lam writes that his intention is to “marry East and West” and I thought about how his prose might be a fusion of Eastern and Western storytelling techniques. Was the brevity of each tale a testament to nonwestern narrative? Was his use of Vietnamese words a way of paying homage to his native tongue? How do bilingual writers provide a sense of who they are without distancing English speaking/writing readers? Most of the essays were no more than ten pages in length. There was somewhat of a linear structure to the book—it begins with his interaction with a teacher then transitions to his experiences as a college student—yet, the collection ultimately ends with letters he wrote as a child to his older brother. Discontinuous History? Last question: who decided the order of the essays themselves?
There were many reoccurring themes in Lam’s collection of essays. My favorite was the concept of the familial alter and worship. Ideas of spirituality, more than food and Anime, seemed to do a lot more for me. Both his mother and grandmother light the incense at the family alter to remember the dead and ask for blessings. Lam claims that the act of writing allows him to remember and pay homage to those who came before him:
“strangely enough, is a kind of ritual, a kind of filial impulse to reconcile mother’s world and my own. The solemnity of the act—my fingers gliding on the keyboard, my mind on things ethereal—is something akin, at last to my mother’s morning prayers.”
Lam claims that he will continue to worship his elders via the written word. Again, he writes that although there isn't complete balance between east and west there is hope--there has been a great deal of change...
“When a Vietnamese man whose parents left his impoverished homeland might very well reach the moon, while Americans turn inward, breathe in and out, and try to reach inner peace and possibly Nirvana, I think that East-West dialogue has come very, very far.”
Thank you for your thorough response. I think we had a similar take on the book, but you were more diplomatic! And, thank you for also pointing out the positive. I also enjoyed the essays that touched on spirituality, in particular the one about his grandmother and visits from her husband's spirit. It was absolutely heart breaking that he couldn't visit her across the world in her dreams. I enjoyed the more universally relateable essays that showed some heart.
ReplyDeleteSeveral points you make in our response make me wonder, who is the audience? And, was Lam conscious of the audience?
It seems like he left out certain histories and thus, limited the readership for this book. I agree with you, what about working class Vietnamese people? And aspiring Vietnamese writers who have not been "charmed" with the same privilege? I was thinking of them as well.
So, when we write? Are we aware of the audience? Who do we write for? Who is Lam's audience?
And as a form, must the essay be so impersonal and distanced? Lam took the personal out of personal essay for me.
Thanks for your in-depth analysis.
-Melissa
I agree with Melissa this is thoughtful and looks at the switches in tone and the places where he goes deep and stays light. We put a lot of expectations on him and i wonder if there is some of our own experience we hope to have confirmed.
ReplyDeleteI hadn't examined the cover, thanks for doing that. It's really interesting. I can't wait for this discussion
e
Melissa, you are spot on with this sentence: "Lam took the personal out of personal essay for me."
ReplyDeleteThat statement might not necessarily be true for every single essay, but the majority of his essays are quite impersonal. Lam provides small moments of vulnerability then quickly writes those moments into past. Even the Vietnam war is constructed in the same way American history books document it--as a nightmare worth forgetting. Yet, if the Vietnamese believe that the dead cannot rest until they are given proper burials then that means there are a hell of a lot of wandering spirits in Lam's homeland. I was interested in the spiritual aspect of healing, of coping with loss. His grandmother ponders: can ghosts cross bodies of water? Although these pieces were short, they seemed to contain the most stakes. They felt unfinished, they didn't contain a nicely packaged thesis like some of the other essays.
Elmaz: I feel you on the expectations. I probably have my own personal investment in some of what he covers--I felt a bit offended by the way he described mixed folks. Mixed folks and immigrants often have similar experiences of feeling torn between conflicting homelands/ancestors. He used words to blend these folks like Blaxican. I've heard that before. But I wondered if Lam, in drawing parallels between his Vietnamese American identity, was trying to avoid the fact that he too has to construct a label for himself--a homeland where he can belong.
-Maddy
Elmaz, it's probably true that I had my own
MADlines,
ReplyDeleteYou pose two questions in your blog that really resonated with me, and that I feel, are probably the two critical questions facing this text:
1) He claims to be marrying East and West as he writes, but what happens if East and West are still at war?
2) How do bilingual writers provide a sense of who they are without distancing English speaking/writing readers?
Regarding the first question, there is a feeling that, for lack of a better term, "Things are different now", meaning Lam is using himself as an example of how things have progressed, and have changed for Asian-American, Pacific Islander, and Southeast Asian groups in America - but what about the oppressive regimes that remain in countries like the Philippines, for example, today? I kinda wanted to hear about the new challenges facing the younger generations that are facing possibly even more problems than Lam...
...and as I write that i wonder, is this Lam's role? Can he encapsulate everything? No, he can't. But I agree, Maddy, that there is a bit something missing here. And not just something, but another part of a community. Simply put, I wanted more personal, and less of the surface-level journalistic pieces that consumed more of the 2nd half of the book.
Great response/questions, thank you!
Like Jose, I'm interested in this what-if question about the East and West still being "at war". I like what Jose has to say about the idea that "Things are different now," because while it may be implied, this does not force that thornier idea that "Things are better now." While I agree that Lam does not address either the Model Minority Myth or the greater global picture, there's another wrinkle to this question that continues to nag at me. And it all seems to come down to Bruce Lee. Kato. The Kung-Fu Sidekick. A great many things could be said about Bruce Lee, but I'm stuck on these two specific questions: Are things different, and are they better? What is progress? So I think of the popular actors of Asian descent gracing the silver screen today. Jackie Chan. Jet Li. Ken Jeong. Uh... John Cho. And, Cho aside, it seems like a startling list. Jackie Chan's highest grossing film in the US is Rush Hour 2, where he plays a kung-fu fighting sidekick. His next most popular movie is Kung Fu Panda (starring, if any reminder is needed, Jack Black). Jet Li actually pairs with Jackie Chan in The Forbidden Kingdom, a movie that brought together two of the most beloved Asian action stars in the US after years of dreaming from cinephiles. The movie is about a white kid from Boston. Ken Jeong: Perhaps best known for portraying an alarming set of negative Asian stereotypes in The Hangover. (John Cho, I'll say again, is cool).
ReplyDeleteAfter a while it gets hard to see how things are different, much less better. Except that now, with several billion more people on the planet since the late 1960s, we have a few more Asian stars bringing Kung Fu (or stereotypes... or John Cho) to the screen in the US.
And that is surely a simple, simple analysis, considering the breadth of social, political, and economic topics that Lam covers, but it does illustrate one of the key issues with asking those questions - for any minority group, for that matter.